Java - appel procéder à n paramètres dans AspectJ - Stack Overflow

assuming that i defined a pointcut of this form

* *.*(..)

and i want to define an around advice, how can i call proceed with an arbitrary number of parameters?

I thought about using reflection and thisJoinPoint.getArgs() but before trying, i would like to know if there's a clean and easy way.

It is a common misunderstanding that proceed takes the same arguments as the method that matches the pattern does. However, proceed takes arguments that advice prescribes.

Example:

class C {   
    public void foo(int i, int j, char c) {
        System.out.println("T.foo() " + i*j + " " + c);
    }
}

class Context {
    public int bar = 7;
    public void doStuff() {
        C c = new C();
        c.foo(2, 3, 'x');
    }
}

with an aspect:

public aspect MyAspect {

    pointcut AnyCall() : 
        call(* *.*(..)) && !within(MyAspect);

    void around(Context c) : AnyCall() && this(c) {
        if (c.bar > 5)
            proceed(c);  // based on "around(Context c)"
    }       
}

assuming that i defined a pointcut of this form

* *.*(..)

and i want to define an around advice, how can i call proceed with an arbitrary number of parameters?

I thought about using reflection and thisJoinPoint.getArgs() but before trying, i would like to know if there's a clean and easy way.

It is a common misunderstanding that proceed takes the same arguments as the method that matches the pattern does. However, proceed takes arguments that advice prescribes.

Example:

class C {   
    public void foo(int i, int j, char c) {
        System.out.println("T.foo() " + i*j + " " + c);
    }
}

class Context {
    public int bar = 7;
    public void doStuff() {
        C c = new C();
        c.foo(2, 3, 'x');
    }
}

with an aspect:

public aspect MyAspect {

    pointcut AnyCall() : 
        call(* *.*(..)) && !within(MyAspect);

    void around(Context c) : AnyCall() && this(c) {
        if (c.bar > 5)
            proceed(c);  // based on "around(Context c)"
    }       
}

Source